In the early 90’s we studied the work of India, on the ecology and biology of agriculture. We also learned about large landscape approaches of China to land rehabilitation. In the US east coast, we captured take home principles from the rational forest land use planning. We also learned about the local networks of people in Australia taking care of their landscapes (Landcare).
These helped build the foundations of my views on the convergence of Agriculture and Forestry as basis for sustainable food. During this period, we also we developed a sort of “best as of the moment “synthesis of agroforestry advances in the Philippines.
Ideas that inspired us (late 80’s early 90’s)
- Ecological agriculture and soil diversity applications in Indian agriculture
- The landscape wide approaches to land rehabilitation in China
- Take home principles from rational forest land management in the US of A
- The role of community networks like the land care movement in Australia
My field notes
Insights
- I had the chance to visit China in the early 90s in the very early days of capitalism. I would say that we should have studied Chinese history more than US history in school.
- India’s pioneering R & D on bio fertilizers and on soil microbial diversity offers continuing benefits to make agriculture more ecologically cool.
- The American colonial government set 18% slope to divide forest lands from agricultural lands – a source of many land management problems today. As if to compensate, their work on forest land management and zoning in helping us in the local forest land use planning processes
- The 1st phase of Australia’s bottoms up LANDCARE program seems to have less than stellar success because it didn’t consider the reciprocal top-down approach. It does provide many learnings to these centuries problems about sustaining networks of actions in NRM and agriculture
Leave a reply